Dennis Gruending 2010. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
Recently I received an email message urging me to read and then pass it along if I want to save Western civilization. The subject line said: Joys of A Muslim Woman: A MUST READ. Actually, it was not about joy at all but was an alarmist rant against Muslims. It was also an example of a recent fetish about “demographic winter”, which has become a favourite preoccupation with the religious right in the United States and to some extent in Canada. The message that I received provides material drawn from an author named Nonie Darwish. She is of Egyptian heritage and her father was a senior officer in the Egyptian army until the Israelis killed him in 1956. Nonie moved to the U.S. in 1978 and became an evangelical Christian. She has written several books and has become prominent on the right wing lecture circuit and media. She is also founder of a group called Arabs For Israel and director of another called Former Muslims United.
One of Darwish’s books is called Cruel and Unusual Punishment:The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law. Her American publisher describes it as “a wake up call to the Western world.” The book blurb continues as follows: “Nonie Darwish presents an insider’s look at sharia and examines how radical Muslim laws are destroying the Western world from within . . . Heed this warning: sharia law is attempting to infiltrate Western culture and destroy democracy.” The viral message I received contained much the same admonition.
Darwish critique
I am not a fan of sharia law and believe, for example, that the Ontario government was wise to refuse suggestions that it be used in that province. But what Darwish is saying – or at the least what is being attributed to her — is boilerplate hysteria and has no place in civilized discourse. Religious extremism is an ugly thing but it comes in all flavours — Muslim, Sikh, Christian, Jewish and Hindu. The vast majority of religious adherents are not jihadists or Christian warriors but rather people who want to live peacefully with their neighbours.
Jim Holstun, an American professor, wrote a critique of Darwish’s work in 2008, after she had published a book called Now They Call Me Infidel. Holstun says that for Darwish there are no real distinctions between moderate or radical Muslims, and no significant differences within or between Arab and Muslim cultures. If that is what Darwish is saying, it would come as news to the approximately 60 people of good will – Muslm and Christian — with whom I attended a 12-week course at the Ottawa School of Theology and Spirituality in 2009 called Islam: A Deeper Look.
Muslims in Canada
The viral message that I received ends with the following invocation: “In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in CANADA to elect the PRIME MINISTER! I think everyone should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!”
The ACLU, of course, is the American Civil Liberties Union, indicating that this message is American in its origin and focus with a bit of Canadian content added on at the end. Interestingly, the name attached to the message is that of a Canadian academic in British Columbia. I have attempted to contact her but have been unable to do so. I want to know if she is actually distributing this message or if someone is playing a nasty trick on her because a variety of right wing websites are circulating the message over her name.
Demographic winter
The comments about there being enough Muslims in Canada in twenty years to elect the prime minister play on the theme of demographic winter. It is an idea much in vogue with the American political and religious right and it turns a long-standing concern about world overpopulation on its head. The problem, according to the new logic, is that a falling birth rate will have what one speaker called “catastrophic” consequences. The narrative usually reads that Western (read white) populations are not having enough babies to replace themselves, and that we will one day (soon) be swamped by immigrants from other races who will come to dominate our societies.
American blogger Bill Berkowitz, a liberal, wrote about demographic winter recently on a blog called The Smirking Chimp. “For many conservatives,” he says, “demographic winter — or ‘birth dearth’ as it is sometimes called — is the ultimate culture war battle, rooted in the rise of feminism, legalized abortion, the acceptance of homosexuality, illegal immigration, and the growth of minority populations. All of this is supposedly the result of a multi-decade campaign by liberals to undermine ‘natural law’ and the ‘natural’ family.”
One right wing website asks this rhetorical question: “Why is global white population declining and not the other groups? Does this have anything to do with the legal recognition of same-sex couples world wide among predominantly white nations in modern history, besides general reluctance to have babies?”
A vast conspiracy
The campaign around demographic winter allows the right to roll all of its straw persons into one vast conspiracy. Muslims, Arabs, immigrants, not to mention Western liberals, feminists and supporters of same sex marriage are all plotting to undermine Western civilization. The alarmists have created an intellectual frame, what one writer calls a “mainstream media shorthand”, to explain disparate events: Muslim veil debates in France (and Quebec); controversies over the construction of mosques in Switzerland (or Alberta); a reduced birthrate in affluent Western countries and a higher one in poorer countries; the closing of empty downtown churches in Europe (and Canada); debates over same sex marriage, even contraception and reproductive choice. One might ask, as a matter of Canadian interest, how the Conservative government’s maternal health policy aimed at helping mothers in poor countries but refusing to fund legal abortion, fits into this frame.
Since 2001, movies, books articles and seminars too numerous to mention have played to the themes of demographic winter and often to an anti-Muslim sentiment. While Europe Slept by Bruce Bawler is one such book. Pat Buchanan’s Death of the West is another. For Canadian content, there is the novel by Patrick Grady called Royal Canadian Jihad. There is also a documentary calledDemographic Winter: The Decline of the Human Family. A seminar held in Washington in June, and sponsored by the Family Research Council dealt with the same theme. The Council is an offshoot of the organization Focus on the Family, which is also present in Canada.
These groups and individuals are also hyperactive on the web. Do a search for the term demographic winter and you will find no end of alarmist sites touting the same dire warnings. On the other hand, there is very little web material that offers a critique of dystopian and chaotic world described by the alarmists. Where are the progressives?
Scary indeed
The introduction to the email message that I received was very direct: “This is scary and you must read it carefully . . .please take your time and understand what it is telling you . . . Let us not become victims. Let us fight and keep our country or we will not have life as we know it for ourselves, our children or our grand children.”
Scary, indeed, that people are wasting their time, and ours, spreading fear and hatred rather than understanding and tolerance.








Well, I guess that I belong to the religious right conspiracy:
- I believe that a people that does not renew generations will eventually disappear;
- I believe that sharia law is unique to islam and has nothing to do with christianism or any other religion.
And I don’t see any conspiracy but two unrelated problems that are, together, about to make the Western civilization history.
The liberal fight against family values has to do with relativism and selfishness, not a conspiracy.
The Sharia is not conspirational since it is not secret. You can see it at work in the muslim world, you can read all about it.
Countries where the population is predominantly Muslim have an officially Muslim state, and a law based on sharia. Exceptions are all due to European interference, even in Turkey (where btw ID cards mention the religious affiliation, and christianism is now thoroughly eradicated).
According to the Muslim law, the right to be Christian is hereditary, as is the obligation to be Muslim. Change is allowed only one way. Apostates of islam must be killed. So you can only be christian if all your ancestors were so since before the muslim conquest – one conversion to islam and the right is gone forever.
Examples abound.
Mohamed Higazi, an Egyptian Muslim by birth, asked his conversion to christianism to be officially ackowkedged, so his daughter could go to christian rather than muslim school: The state rejected his request, and the Al Azhar mosque, the most prominent in the sunni world, ordered “good muslims” to kill him, his wife, and daughter when she reaches 10, unless she reverts to islam.
Al Azhar is the mosque of Cairo, where president Obama delivered his speech to the Muslim world.
In Morocco, a moderate Muslim country, it is forbidden by law for Muslims to become christian, to talk Muslims into becoming christian, or to just induce them into doubting their islamic faith.
Needless to say, equality between the Muslim and non-Muslim makes no sense under an islamic regime, since government is based on Muslim principles and therfore requires people to be predominantly Muslim.
The Bible is practically forbidden in the Muslim world (in Saudi Arabia it is forbidden by law), for to own one would be admitting apostasy.
Remember that priest who wanted to burn a Quran, and the Left called that an autodafe ? Well, an autodafe used to be an effective way to forbid a text, and the Quran is not forbidden in America; but the Bible is forbidden in the Muslim world.
So is real islam in the real world.
Now, you are free to believe that none of this is real, no one forces you to take facts. You can deny that sharia is built into islam, because you don’t want to hurt the feelings of the Muslims.
But I don’t think that you can boast any moral superiority over, and show contempt of, those who acknowledge the facts, inconvenient as they may be.
Many christian are sick and tired of seeing their religion likened to islam, when it actually preaches the exact opposite, and produced quite the opposite.
Jihad, the war to impose sharia law, has been permanent in the history of the muslim world, whereas holy war in 2000 years of christianism have been the exception. And a reasonable one since it was about the right for christians to visit the tomb of Jesus Christ – ask the Muslim whether they would fight for the right to visit Mecca (btw a place forbidden non-Muslims under penalty of death).
Christianism cannot produce, never has and enever will, what islam essentially is : A theocracy. Somehow many atheist deniers just cannot come to grip with the concept. Although islam, as bad as it may be for christianism, is far worse for any other belief especially atheism.
Why is denial so strong among liberal atheists ? Aren’t believers supposed to deny facts, and non-delievers to reject beliefs contrary to facts ?