Why was Youth For Christ singled out for contempt for its mission statement? when its done what other organizations and interest groups have done to apply for public funding in proper form on an equal basis

On a larger note, why wasn’t there an expressed tolerance for what the YFC stands for? Just because it stands in opposition to some of Canada’s civic virtues like tolerance of homosexuality, does not necessarily equate the group with terrorists

For the YFC Rec center itself, relevant questions about what is their policy regarding youth evangelization, process, schedule? and the substance of their parental waiver form needs to be put out in front of public scrutiny
To be fair, they need to be transparent on their use of public funds and their programs since they’re using public money

The first bunch of questions go to people in the local area.
Then provincial and national.

Questions such which religious groups are staffed, trained and prepared to borrow or accept taxpayer money for their projects?

What short term and long term impacts do parachurch groups have in a neighbourhood?

Why did Winnipeg/feds and YFC move now? What was the problem with YFC finding it’s own funding?

Is this going to be policy on social funding whether Canadians want it or not?
http://www.cardus.ca/organization/news/43/

Are religious charities with open religious agendas able operate without their hand out five years from now?

How safe are the kids who will be using that centre? Was that looked at?

The reaction against the process was an honest one, not all of it was agenda driven.
I’m not hearing local churches and parachurch groups speaking out in favour.

Is bigger always better?
Is is always location, location, location?

What does city council and the feds handing out the money need to be listening to?

Questions are easy Aldrich, the Winnipeg YFC centre been long on public trumpeting and posturing and short on facts.

What would you ask?

The first bunch of questions go to people in the local area.
Then provincial and national.

Questions such which religious groups are staffed, trained and prepared to borrow or accept taxpayer money for their projects?

What short term and long term impacts do parachurch groups have in a neighbourhood?

Why did Winnipeg/feds and YFC move now? What was the problem with YFC finding it’s own funding?

Is this going to be policy on social funding whether Canadians want it or not?
http://www.cardus.ca/organization/news/43/

Are religious charities with open religious agendas able operate without their hand out five years from now?

How safe are the kids who will be using that centre? Was that looked at?

The reaction against the process was an honest one, not all of it was agenda driven.
I’m not hearing local churches and parachurch groups speaking out in favour.

Is bigger always better?
Is is always location, location, location?

What does city council and the feds handing out the money need to be listening to?

Questions are easy Aldrich, the Winnipege YFC centre been long on public trumpeting and posturing and short on facts.

What would you ask?

YFC Brandon got what they wanted.
Now YFC Winnipeg.
This is politics, who you know, who you are networking with, who pushes the paper.
The questions haven’t changed, the process being shoved at taxpayers needs to be openly discussed.

http://mayorsbreakfast.ca/